March 31, 2009
Dracula was born in Transylvania
True or False?
The German Saxons of the area did not like him, and wrote negatively about him.
True or False?
The West has a more negative view of him whereas in the East, such as Russia, the view is more positive.
Why do you think that the Transylvanian Saxons viewed Vlad Dracul in such a negative light?
I think it is because he was a leader with whom they did not identify and that their culture was different than that of Vlad's. Perhaps there was the issue of money, which caused friction between the merchants and Vlad...
March 30, 2009
I'd love to write my little heart out on his exploits but I am needed a good picture or two.
What I do know is that according to Saxons of Transylvania Vlad Tepes Dracul (Dracula) was born in Transylvania and became the "heartless" Prince of Wallachia.
I'm a Saxon by ancestry, but I wonder about that commentary. The Romanians don't seem to have as much hate for him. In fact tehy put in in a more positive light.
Of course they admit that he did commit many--let's be politically correct here-- human right violation our the course of his reign but still he did help with the fight against the Turks.
I wonder if there is another side to the man that the Western population is not getting from their sources.
It's also a great time to sit down and read Bram Stoker's Dracula again, as I am trying to get something good from that as well.
March 29, 2009
The grey section is the land that Austria had during at the end of its Empire.
It is good to note that Transylvania is part of Austria-Hungary-- that was what the Empire was known as. It was located close to the Romanian border.
Transylvania was part of Hungary, which was the Kingdom of Hungary in the Empire. This was before... World War I.
No, the land is not found in Africa, which was one of the questions I've been asked!
March 28, 2009
Short term memory I suppose. After the end of the Second World War, people from Poland, the Czech Republic and The Slovak Republic left by the hundreds of thousands the result being that many of the cities were under populated for decades.
It also happened in Hungary and Romania. So, the effect was wide spread.
They were all ordinary people, whose only common link was that they were Germans, at least by their origins. All of their unique cultures are now extinct or almost extinct.
Where is the History? In oral traditions
March 27, 2009
They lived in their homes for more than seven hundred years. They had their farms and their vineyards.
They lost everything.
Now even their culture is dying. I suspect that in about a generation- twenty years or so, the people will have lost everything that they lived and worked so hard for. Their culture, as with so many others will be dead.
So then why the book?
Well, my goal is 60 days until I can make some timid changes from the point of View of people who lived through the Second World War.
Will this be another case of a revived culture?
March 26, 2009
March 25, 2009
March 21, 2009
Beyond the legends and the time of the Romans? There is Dacia, and the Roman invasion, Dracula and the novel. But there are also the people, the places. Browning, the English poet, wrote about one such group-- the Saxons, who lived in Transylvania. (Some still do but most live in North America or Germany now.)
Translyvania is a unique and wonderful place.
March 17, 2009
In Hungary. Which was a part of the Austrian Empire or the Dual Monarchy of Austria and Hungary. it was known as this long after the dissolution of the monarchy. In fact up until after the Second World war it was called the Kingdom of Hungary-- but it did not have a King.
Where was Transylvania during the Second World War?
Romania and Hungary. In 1940 it was divided into two parts with the Northern half going to Hungary and the Southern remaining in Romania.
|A Image of Where Northern Transylvania was 1940|
And we wonder why Transylvania is a bit romantic and different. We should know by its history. I am one of them who feel that Transylvania has a lot more to offer people than what is now available to them. Part of this is the understanding that there was many territorial changes between the principality of Transylvania, which became a part of Hungary and then a part of the Empire of Auto-Hungary and then a part of the Kingdom of Romania.
Yet, many people do not view territory in a historical light but rather in a political one, where who has which territory is more important than the history behind it all.
March 16, 2009
March 11, 2009
March 9, 2009
March 6, 2009
Okay good. Now ever searched for Transylvania?
Good... good. now what do you find?
Not a great read I must admit. Once it hits about the 18th Century it misses a lot. Yes, I know big changes small place but still. What more should be in there?
Why all the people of Transylvania received such little mention?
Of course you can get lost in Wikipedia. But it needs to be correct. Improved.
Time to get lost in the Real Transylvania.
March 3, 2009
Not better tourism. More history... But that is a lot...
Maybe the acknowledgement of the other non-Romanians might go a long way.
Queen Maria was German- English.
What about others who were educated outside Romania?
This land could be great once more.